Open post signs of addiction

How to Recognize the Signs of Addiction and Find Help for Your Loved One

When you’re not familiar with the signs of addiction, it can be a difficult disease to identify.

Sadly, that’s one of the reasons why someone with a substance use disorder can often hide their addiction from family members for months or even years.

If your loved one is suffering from addiction, there’s a long list of physical, behavioral and emotional signs that are fairly easy to identify once you know where to look.

The Most Common Warning Signs of Addiction

Everyone experiences the symptoms of addiction a bit differently, with some showing more signs than others. Recognizing the signs and knowing what to look for will help you find your loved one the help they need much sooner so they can get on the path to recovery.

Physical Signs

Changes to the Eyes & Skin

The look of a person’s eyes and skin reveals a lot about their health and wellbeing. If you notice that your loved one’s eyes are often bloodshot or glazed over, that could be a sign of drug use. Some substances cause our pupils to constrict. Others cause severe fatigue which can show up as persistent dark circles or bags under the eyes.

Over time, drug use will cause skin–especially facial skin–to look dull, pale, inflamed, or even jaundiced. Consistent injection marks, scabs, or bruises are also a clear sign of drug use.

Insomnia or Hypersomnia

Drugs and alcohol directly impact sleep patterns. Depending on the substance and the person, addiction can make it hard to sleep. It can also cause hypersomnia or oversleeping. Both have negative impacts on alertness and energy levels and are fairly easy to recognize.

Weight Loss

Sudden weight loss is one of the most noticeable signs of addiction. If your loved one loses a lot of weight in a short period of time, take notice of their eating habits. The same is true if their weight keeps fluctuating. Both are signs they may need help.

Other Physical Signs

While changes to skin and eye appearance, sleep habits, and weight are three of the most common physical indicators of addiction, there are many others to look for as well. Your loved one may also suffer from addiction if they exhibit these other physical signs.

  • Memory loss
  • Injuries
  • Ongoing Illness
  • Body odor
  • Unhealthy teeth, hair and nails
  • Slurred words
  • Unexplained sweating, shaking

Emotional Signs

Anxiety and Depression

Signs of depression and anxiety are some of the more common symptoms of substance use disorder. This can include extreme lows as well as manic highs and worry.

Apathy or Low Motivation

Substance use disorder can make a person feel emotionally numb. A lot of times they lose interest in the activities that they used to get excited about. Addiction reduces a person’s drive, ambition, and motivation. If your loved one is typically a highly motivated person but suddenly loses all ambition, this is a strong sign of addiction.

Not Acting Like Themselves

Any major changes in behavior, whatever they may be, can be a sign of addiction as well. Trust your gut. If a behavior your loved one is exhibiting doesn’t seem normal, they may need help from a professional.

These behaviors may include:

  • Irritability
  • Suicidal thoughts
  • Aggression
  • And others

Behavioral Signs

Socially Withdrawn

If your loved one went from a socially engaged friend and family member to suddenly withdrawn from social activities, this is a sign that they could be suffering from addiction. Drug and alcohol use disorders cause people to isolate and stay to themselves, which can fuel feelings of loneliness and depression that trigger the desire to use.

Neglectful

When someone is addicted to drugs or alcohol, nothing is more important to them then using. With every other part of life deprioritized, they can start neglecting responsibilities – everything from meeting financial obligations and going to work to caring for family and keeping their home clean.

Lying and Secrecy

People addicted to drugs and alcohol will lie to cover up their addiction. They’ll likely lie to you, employers, friends and physicians and anyone they want to keep from knowing the truth. Lies and secrecy go hand-in-hand with substance use disorder. This is one of the hardest signs to recognize, but also one of the most telling that your loved one needs help.

How to Start the Conversation When You Discover Your Loved One Needs Help

Approaching a highly sensitive subject like substance use disorder with someone you love can be an extremely difficult conversation to begin. And it gets even harder if they’ve been lying, keeping the addiction a secret, or have been aggressive – all signs that they won’t be receptive to acknowledging or discussing their addiction.

Set the stage for a successful conversation by first taking the following steps.

  • Think ahead to how you’ll introduce the conversation
  • Consult a trusted family member or friend for guidance
  • Choose a comfortable place where you can talk privately
  • Choose a day and time when the conversation won’t be rushed
  • Communicate with empathy and compassion
  • Don’t pass judgement or blame
  • Suggest they get support through a treatment center
  • Listen more than you talk

Recovery Begins with a Strong Support System

Recovery from addiction isn’t meant to happen alone. It’s a life-long process that requires a strong support system of professional counselors, a community of other people also working to recover, and the compassion and love of family.

At The GateHouse, we create a support system for each of our clients to break the cycle of addiction and get them on a path towards recovery. Whether they need our residential extended care treatment, a transitional living environment, or outpatient support, we are here for them. Our outpatient services program also includes initial assessments that help us determine the proper course of treatment. Every step is individualized, so our clients receive the best care for their personal needs.

When you and your loved one are ready to discuss a treatment plan and start the journey towards long-term addiction recovery, our team will be here ready to support you on your way.

The GateHouse offers addiction treatment services for long-term addiction recovery with locations throughout Lancaster County, PA. We’d love to help you with your next step in recovery. Reach out to us today!

Open post Partial Hospitalization Program

What is a Partial Hospitalization Program (PHP) for Substance Use Disorder

 


 

What is a Partial Hospitalization Program?

Partial Hospitalization Program, or PHP, is a short-term, comprehensive program of intensive outpatient therapy. At The GateHouse, Individuals attend group sessions four days a week for five hours per day. Patients also meet with their Primary Counselor twice a week as part of their individualized therapy.

Is PHP an evidence-based program?

The curriculum used at The GateHouse for PHP is evidence-based, which means the methods have been rigorously proven effective in the treatment of alcohol and substance use disorders.

What are the benefits of PHP versus solely attending a support group?

PHP provides individualized and specialized group therapies facilitated by professionals and specialists who teach proven strategies for managing specific problems such as trauma, gender-specific issues, and co-occurring disorders.

What classes are provided during PHP?

In addition to meditation, The GateHouse offers a life-skills group, which focuses on:

  • money management
  • budgeting
  • resume writing
  • job search assistance and resources
  • banking
  • other types of access to community resources

Psycho-education classes provide education on issues specific to those struggling with substance use disorders, including trauma, co-occurring disorders, cognitive distortions, and other issues. This includes a discussion with every person in the group to identify how they relate to each topic or how it occurs in their own lives.

What is a typical day of PHP at The GateHouse?

A typical schedule looks like this:

8:30 a.m. – Check-in

9-9:45 a.m. – Meditation and morning meeting –

10 a.m.-12 p.m. – Psycho-education Group

12-12:30 p.m. – Lunch

12:30-1:30 p.m. – Processing Group or Life-Skills Group

1:30-2 p.m. – Closing Group

Fridays include weekly progress updates and weekend prep work to keep clients actively engaged in their treatment program.

How long does PHP typically last?

PHP is a short-term, intensive service. The GateHouse facilitates person-centered therapy, which is guided by the client’s preferences. Most individuals may expect a period of four to six weeks of PHP.

How many people attend the program?

Groups consist of 10 to 12 individuals so that everyone receives the individual attention they need and deserve.

What health care providers or staff are involved in PHP?

The GateHouse has an extensive staff to support the needs of clients, including our Medical Director, Clinical Director, Psychiatrist, Case Managers, Peer Support, Clinicians, and Community Resource Providers as well as members of the recovery community.

Does The GateHouse provide housing for PHP clients?

GateHouse offers housing for those who need it at no additional cost.

What is the philosophy of The GateHouse in treating addiction?

The GateHouse strives to create a community where everyone struggling with addiction is able to pursue and ultimately restore their human spirit.

The GateHouse staff members truly embody the values of our agency.  We walk beside our clients and cultivate a culture that encourages opportunities for growth while supporting them in their journey to overcome addiction. Ultimately, our vision is for our clients to maintain a lifelong lifestyle of recovery.

Why should I entrust my loved one or myself to Gatehouse?

The GateHouse has been providing accredited, community-based recovery care since 1972. Our services are gender-neutral.

Click here to learn more about what makes The GateHouse stand out from other rehabilitation centers as well as our treatment outcomes.

What is the next step for those recovering from addiction after PHP?

One can reasonably expect to be stepped down to a lower level of care, such as Intensive Outpatient Programs (IOP) or other outpatient services. The GateHouse offers IOP and general outpatient treatment. Maintaining support is crucial in sustaining recovery.

Does insurance cover PHP?

The GateHouse works with medical assistance and county assistance as well as some commercial insurance companies to cover PHP.

If you or a loved one are looking for a trusted and effective partial hospitalization program to overcome substance use disorder, our caring staff members at The GateHouse welcome an opportunity to speak with you! Please contact us today by phone or email. All information is 100% confidential.

Open post Pennsylvania Drug and Alcohol Programs Secretary Jen Smith

Finding Hope in the Opioid Crisis: An Interview with Pennsylvania Secretary of Drug and Alcohol Programs Jen Smith

In today’s highly polarized political climate, it might seem as though there are no subjects upon which lawmakers from the Left and Right can agree. Even here in Pennsylvania, legislators clash over taxes, health care, spending, and more.

Believe it or not, though, there is at least one critically important issue upon which Pennsylvania Republicans and Democrats are largely united: stemming the tide of drug and alcohol abuse in the Commonwealth.

A Nonpartisan Issue with Bipartisan Support

For Jen Smith, Secretary of Pennsylvania’s Department of Drug and Alcohol Programs, the broad consensus around finding solutions and finding funding to implement those solutions has been a welcome change. Appointed by Gov. Tom Wolf to head the Department in 2018, Smith had previously served in the department since 2016, when she was a deputy secretary. She’s seen the General Assembly’s approach to the issue change dramatically during her four years in the Department.

“I am one of the very, very fortunate cabinet secretaries in that this issue and really everything my department does is pretty bipartisan,” Smith said during a recent interview with The GateHouse. “I don’t really get a lot of resistance from one side or the other. I think everyone believes in saving lives and keeping people healthy, which is our mission, so I’m very lucky.”

That doesn’t mean, however, that things have been easy—especially during an opioid epidemic that has transformed and evolved over the years, ultimately culminating in Gov. Wolf’s decision to declare the crisis a “disaster” in January 2018.

“It wasn’t until late 2016 early 2017 that we really started to escalate the discussion,” Smith said. “We recognized that it wasn’t just more people becoming addicted; people were really dying in just exponential numbers. That’s when it started to become known as an epidemic or a crisis. By 2018, we had picked up so much momentum. There was much more discussion about opioids specifically and addiction and overdoses in general.”

The Impact of the Disaster Declaration

The disaster declaration escalated the urgency of the crisis and allowed for specific action to be taken, starting with the creation of an Opioid Command Center that has since brought nearly every department in state government together on a weekly basis to assess and respond to the crisis. The declaration also changed how elected officials view the problem.

Last week, for example, Smith said she met with State Senators to review the Commonwealth’s budget, and the change in tone from her first year with the Department was remarkable, she said.

“It was just so drastically different from the very first budget hearing I participated in in 2016,” Smith said. “Back then, the questions were, ‘Well, how much does it cost to treat somebody?’ ‘How much money do you need to fix this problem?’ and ‘When are you going to have it fixed?’ The tone of the questions during this year’s hearings was much more thoughtful. Lawmakers were asking, ‘How can we be more helpful?’ ‘What’s the most effective kind of medication?’ ‘How do we get this medication into the hands of providers?’ ‘How do we ensure we have adequate capacity to treat people?’”

Smith said Legislators are much more educated about the problem now than they were in the past.

“They don’t just see it as a problem that simply needs to be fixed,” she said. “They now see it as a very complicated and complex issue. They also recognize that they are not experts on this, but they still want to be helpful where they can and contribute positively to the cause. That’s a huge difference from where we were four years ago.”

Maintaining Urgency

Secretary Jen Smith
Last month, Secretary Jen Smith appeared before the U.S. House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Oversight to discuss the ongoing opioid crisis.

The disaster declaration was a double-edged sword in some ways, however. As the death numbers from opioid overdoses began to plateau and even decline in 2018, so did the urgency surrounding the epidemic. Success is important, but it also must be sustained, Smith said.

“I have sensed just within the last calendar year that there’s much less momentum around the crisis,” she said. “Part of that, I think, is people get tired of talking about it and hearing about it. Part of it is seeing some successes in terms of changing the trend of overdose deaths. Those successes are good, but the decrease in momentum is also a little bit dangerous from my perspective because we certainly haven’t kicked this.”

Smith said the Commonwealth has a long way to go. In fact, as the opioid scare has started to subside, the Secretary said she has seen an increase in more polysubstance abuse, with individuals with substance use disorder combining opioids and stimulants such as cocaine and methamphetamines. Alcohol use disorder, a persistent problem for generations, is also front and center in the discussion.

“I’ve sort of seen a waxing and waning a bit of the opioid crisis, but certainly not a waning of what I call the ‘addiction crisis’ in the state,” she said. “It’s an interesting cycling of substances and one that we have to really keep a close eye on. It’s important for us to make sure that the treatment system and the recovery support to accompany it are flexible and able to meet the needs of those changing trends.”

Arming police, EMS personnel and even park rangers with naloxone has been a big push in Pennsylvania and is clearly one of the reasons opioid and heroin death rates have declined in recent years. But when it comes to addressing and combatting the long-term issues associated with opioid use disorder, the approach by Harrisburg lawmakers over the last few years has been focused heavily on Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT). While MAT continues to play a key role, Smith also emphasized that long-term aftercare recovery centers like The GateHouse are “very important” to helping recovering addicts turn their lives around.

“Treatment is Treatment”

“For the last couple of years, we’ve sort of heard this consistent debate about MAT versus drug-free treatment; like ‘Which is better?’ and ‘Which is more important to have?’” Smith said. “In my mind, I have a very difficult time when the discussion heads in that direction because to me, they are two distinct things. For me, treatment is treatment and medication could be part of the treatment or it might not be part of the treatment.”

Smith’s vision of the perfect drug and alcohol treatment system is where providers have the ability to prescribe medication when it’s appropriate but also understand that it won’t be appropriate in every instance.

“Facilities like The Gatehouse are critical because they provide treatment to individuals in our communities who need it, whether they’re on MAT or not,” she said. “The messaging gets a little distorted because federal grant dollars are often tied to improving access to medication. That’s really because, for so many years, there were programs that were exclusionary to medication, and there was an attempt to move the pendulum back toward the middle. It wasn’t an attempt to say that anyone who has a substance use disorder has to be on medication, because that’s absolutely untrue.”

Treatment plans—medication-assisted or otherwise—are different from person to person, Smith said.

“There are substances for which there are no FDA approved medications, and there are substances like alcohol for which there are some approved medications, but they are not successful for everyone,” she said. “Then we’ve got folks with opioid use disorder, where we know that the standard of care would be medication, but what that looks like for each person could be different. There are folks for which medication is not appropriate, and there are some for which medication might be appropriate for a month or two until they get themselves stabilized and have received behavioral therapy and are at a place where they feel like they don’t need those medications anymore.”

In many ways, Smith has helmed the Department of Drug and Alcohol Programs at one of the most pivotal moments in the Commonwealth’s history. The last four years have dramatically changed the perception of individuals with substance use disorder for not only lawmakers but the general public at large. While the stigma hasn’t been completely lifted, the shift in tone and the attention that the opioid crisis has commanded during Wolf’s tenure as governor have ushered in a new era of understanding and compassion. It’s made Smith’s job easier—and a lot more productive.

“I think the Legislature has responded very well to our initiatives, and it really has been great to work with people who, for the most part, understand what we’re trying to do and want to help,” Smith said. “That’s a very big difference from where we were four years ago. It’s very encouraging to have the Legislature as a partner instead of an adversary.”

For more information about The GateHouse or our programs and services visit Our Services page, or call 717-393-3215.

Open post Rachel Levine

Opioid Crisis Q&A with Dr. Rachel Levine, Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Health

Recently, The GateHouse had the good fortune to sit down with Dr. Rachel Levine, Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Health, for a wide-ranging discussion about the opioid crisis in the Commonwealth. Our goal was to learn more about how Dr. Levine, Gov. Tom Wolf, and the rest of the administration are approaching this crisis and what Pennsylvanians can expect from the future efforts of state government.

TGH: Thank you so much for taking the time to speak with us today. To start, can you please tell us the role that the Pennsylvania Department of Health plays in combatting the opioid crisis and how this issue has affected you personally?

Secretary Levine: The opioid crisis really remains the biggest public health crisis that we face in Pennsylvania and the nation. It’s natural for the Department of Health to be very involved in collaboration with all the other departments in terms of this effort. If you actually look across the country, many public health departments—in fact most—have been very involved in this.

I am the president-elect of ASTHO, the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, and this is one of the issues that we talk about at our meetings all the time. The only thing from a professional point of view is that my field is adolescent and adult medicine, so I trained in pediatrics with a fellowship in adolescent and young adult medicine, and so my whole career has been involved with the intersection of medical issues and behavioral health issues. So, the opioid crisis, from a professional point of view, is right up my alley.

I started and ran the adolescent medicine and eating disorder program at Penn State Hershey, and we saw lots of patients with substance abuse issues even though it wasn’t a substance abuse program.  Again, professionally, that intersection of medical issues and mental health issues has really been the focus of my whole career.

TGH: Not too long ago, Gov. Wolf declared the opioid crisis a disaster emergency. How has that changed the approach the Commonwealth has taken to the opioid crisis?

Secretary Levine: It has changed it completely. Gov. Wolf’s Opioid Disaster Declaration was announced in January 2018, so we’re actually approaching the second anniversary of this. These are 90-day disaster declarations, and actually, this week (Dec. 3, 2019), the governor renewed that declaration for the eighth time. This declaration has allowed us to form the Opioid Command Center, which meets weekly at the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Association. It’s this unique collaboration of 16 or 17 different state agencies, including the state Attorney General’s office and the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Association, which is through the federal government, all meeting every week to look at the opioid crisis from all of our different perspectives. That includes the health and human service agencies, the Department of Health, the Department of Human Services, the Department of Drug and Alcohol Programs, the Department of Aging, and then you have the perspectives of public safety and law enforcement, including the Pennsylvania State Police, the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, the Pennsylvania Commission for Crime and Delinquency, the AG’s office as I said, and then other agencies—for instance, Education, Military and Veterans affairs, Labor and Industry—who are all looking at the opioid crisis and collaborating our responses. So, I think that that has been a game changer, in terms of the state’s addressing the opioid crisis.

TGH: As early as 2016, when you were the Commonwealth’s Physician General, you had called for an “all-hands-on-deck” response from state government to combatting the opioid crisis. How do you think the government—both the Wolf Administration and the state Legislature—has responded since then in your opinion?

Secretary Levine: This has been a priority of Gov. Wolf’s since the beginning of his first term. Our term started in 2015. The inauguration was on a Tuesday and that Wednesday was the first meeting at the Governor’s policy office on the opioid crisis. This has always been a priority for Gov. Wolf, and his leadership has been absolutely key. The Department of Health has been collaborating with other agencies since the very beginning, but it focused on health and human service agencies. The disaster declaration broadened this to help foster collaboration with public safety, law enforcement and other agencies. The “all-hands-on-deck” approach has absolutely been key.

We also collaborate with the Legislature. This a completely non-partisan issue and the Governor has always been working with the Legislature. We also collaborate with counties and communities, with other states, as I mentioned ASTHO, and then of course, the federal government. We might have many disagreements in terms of federal policy, but actually in terms of the opioid crisis, we have had very good collaboration with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, particularly SAMHSA (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration), and of course the Centers for Disease Contro (CDC), and then robust funding from the federal government as well.

TGH: Lancaster County District Attorney Craig Stedman recently told us that he believes one of the answers to the opioid crisis isn’t just recovery, but long-term recovery. He told us, “Short-term recovery just doesn’t give the brain of a heavy heroin user the time it needs to recover from acute addiction.” Do you agree with him, and if so, are there any initiatives or legislative proposals that would make the path to long-term recovery clearer for opioid addicts?

Secretary Levine: I like the comments in terms of the issues with the brain. The Surgeon General of the United States has called addiction “a chronic relapsing neurological disorder.” I think that that is a very good description. As you know, there are particular brain changes, circuit changes that occur with substance use. I think that, from my perspective, we need to view addiction as a medical condition, and certainly not as a moral failing, and even more so as a chronic medical condition, and particularly as a chronic, potentially, relapsing medical condition. Long term recovery needs to be viewed in that context.

We’re certainly in favor of all forms of treatment, and the treatment needs to be individualized to the specific patient.  For many, if not most patients with opioid use disorder, we’ve been devoting our resources—and this is in full agreement with the federal government, SAMHSA and the CDC—on emphasizing medication-assisted treatment. Those medications can include methadone or buprenorphine medications, such as Suboxone, although there are other brands. And then, long-acting Naltrexone or Vivitrol, which works in a different way. I think you’ll find that most patients with opioid use disorder are going to do best with medication-assisted treatment, and we have expanded that availability through the Centers of Excellence, through the department of Human Services for patients predominantly on Medicaid, as well as through another program the Department of Health has sponsored called PAC-MAT, which stands for Pennsylvania Coordinated Medication Assisted Treatment. And so, I think the idea is that the medication allows the brain the time it needs to heal and to try to prevent that type of relapse.

There are a lot of unanswered questions in terms of medication-assisted treatment. One of them, of course, is how long should the medication be continued. There are a lot of different responses to that. Unfortunately, we don’t really know. There aren’t biological markers about which patients can be weaned off the medication and which patients can’t. So, that’s a decision between the patient and his or her physician.

TGH: Do you think enough is being done by the General Assembly to combat the opioid crisis? What more could be done by Pennsylvania lawmakers, in your opinion, to combat opioid use disorder?

Secretary Levine: We have been in very close collaboration with the Legislature on this issue. In 2014, the Legislature enacted Act 139, which authorized third-party prescriptions for Naloxone. Then, at the Department of Health, first as Physician General, and then as Secretary of Health, I wrote two standing order prescriptions. One was for first responders to have access to Naloxone, and the other is for the general public to have access to Naloxone. So, we have pushed out thousands and thousands of doses of Naloxone, which has resulted in saving thousands of lives. That was a collaboration with the Legislature that began even before the Wolf administration started. Another bill in 2014 was the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP). That program started in August 2016, and over the last three years, through many measures, including the PDMP, we have effectively decreased the rate of opioid prescriptions by 30%. As a prevention method, I think that that has been key. One bill that we worked on with the Legislature was requiring continuing medical education for physicians. So, there has been lots of different collaboration with the Legislature on the opioid crisis.

TGH: What would you like to see done in the short-term to alleviate some of the bigger problems that are still outstanding with the opioid crisis?

Secretary Levine: Legislation that we’re going to be pushing in 2020 is the Syringe Service Program (SSP) and traditional harm reduction. Now, I want to draw a distinction between the Syringe Service Program and what Philadelphia was recently discussing, which is safe injection sites. That’s a whole other thing. SSPs have been available in the United States for decades. In fact, Philadelphia and Pittsburgh have had theirs for almost 30 years. Technically, however, SSPs are illegal under Pennsylvania law, and so they’re not able to be formed legally in other parts of the state. So, as strongly supported by the Department of Health and Human Services federally, as well as the CDC, we want to legalize SSPs and traditional harm reduction in Pennsylvania so that syringe service programs can start in other local areas. SSPs have been shown through many studies to be helpful in preventing HIV, preventing hepatitis, as well as serving as an access point to treatment, to getting Naloxone, and as an access point to referring people for treatment, and particularly medication assisted treatment. Our new initiative will be the legalization of syringe service programs.

Editor’s note: According to the CDC, “Syringe services programs … are community-based prevention programs that can provide a range of services, including linkage to substance use disorder treatment; access to and disposal of sterile syringes and injection equipment; and vaccination, testing, and linkage to care and treatment for infectious diseases.”

TGH: What about long-term aftercare programs like those offered by The GateHouse? Where do they fit in?

Secretary Levine: There are three pillars to our response under the disaster declaration. The first is Prevention. That includes school-based prevention, that includes community-based prevention, and then the work that I have done with the medical community, which I call “opioid stewardship.” The second pillar is Rescue. And that, of course, involves the medication Naloxone. And then the third pillar is Treatment and specifically, treatment leading to recovery. Our emphasis with opioid use disorder has been with either what you call “medication assisted treatment,” or “medications for opioid use disorder (or MOUD).” That is obviously where our emphasis has been.

There are other drugs, however, which are threats on the horizon—particularly methamphetamines and cocaine—which require adjustments to our response. It’s an ever-changing landscape in the Opioid Command Center, but under the leadership of Gov. Wolf, we’re going to be right there helping the state address this crisis.

***

Dr. Levine graduated from Harvard College and the Tulane University School of Medicine. She completed her training in Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine at the Mt. Sinai Medical Center in New York City. She joined the Wolf Administration in 2015 as Physician General, and in 2017 was named Acting Secretary of Health, before being confirmed as Secretary of Health in 2018. She is currently a Professor of Pediatrics and Psychiatry at the Penn State College of Medicine and a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine, and the Academy for Eating Disorders. You can learn more about her here.

Open post Extraordinary Give 2019

Help Us Transform and Encourage Lives of Recovery by Participating in the Extraordinary Give

It’s been an exciting year for The GateHouse.

Not only did we open a brand-new facility in Marietta, we hosted the U.S. Labor Secretary for a roundtable discussion on the opioid crisis, and we launched a new, user-friendly website!

As exciting as all of this is, none of it would have been possible without your help and support and the help and support of the recovery community and the community at large. We want to encourage you to continue supporting us by using Friday, Nov. 22 as the day to show your appreciation for the people who work at The GateHouse and the lives that have been transformed. That’s the date of the Extarordinary Give, an annual day of giving sponsored by the Lancaster County Community Foundation.

The ExtraGive is a day where people across Lancaster County come together to financially support the causes they care about. It’s a day when nonprofits of every stripe encourage their supporters to open their hearts and help them raise money for the important work they do.

Last year, The GateHouse raised more than $34,000—crushing the previous year’s fund-raising effort by a wide margin. We were overwhelmed by the generosity of our community, and this wonderful show of support solidified our resolve and validated the work our team is doing to restore the human spirit through recovery.

This year, we hope to build on that success and raise even more money to help those afflicted by the disease of addiction. And we’ll have some help! Every dollar you donate to The GateHouse will be STRETCHED by more than $500,000 thanks to the generosity of Rodgers & Associates, the High Foundation, and numerous other community sponsors.

Please take a moment to check out our donation page at ExtraGive.org. The best part about giving to The GateHouse this year is you get something back for your contribution.

Not only is your Extraordinary Give donation tax-deductible, you will also have your name or the name of a loved one etched into the history of our organization at Riverview Tower, our newest location.

While we appreciate contributions of any size, by becoming a Memorial Donor, your gift to The GateHouse comes with an enduring permanence. Please take a look at our Memorial Donor levels for more information and to see which one appeals to you.

Can you tell our Finance Director is excited about the the Extraordinary Give?

You might be wondering how we’ll be using your contributions to The GateHouse and what purpose our fund-raising efforts will serve. We’re happy to say that money raised through the Extraordinary Give will go towards the efforts to one day offer residential recovery services to women who live with their children. It’s a big step for us and we hope you’ll help us realize this vision.

JOIN US!

The GateHouse is also taking part in The Extraordinary Experience event on Nov. 22 at the Holiday Inn of Lancaster. This event will feature our organization along with about 20 other nonprofits from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. Each organization will offer their own “experience” to those in attendance. Our Experience will be to “spend 5 to 10 minutes in private with a drug and alcohol professional to ask anything you wish!”

Other experiences include repelling down the side of the Holiday Inn, show-tune karaoke, music and entertainment, food, fun, and more!

Please join us for this extraordinary event!

Remember, when giving through ExtraGive website, be sure to include your email so we can follow-up and collect information for the donor memorial.

As always, thank you for your support!

 

[button link=”https://www.extragive.org/organizations/the-gatehouse” type=”icon” color=”#045B66″ newwindow=”yes”]SEE OUR #EXTRAGIVE PAGE[/button]

Open post managing success in recovery

Seven Tips to Managing Success in Recovery

Managing success in recovery isn’t easy.

The times when we’re most vulnerable to our addictive nature isn’t necessarily when times are tough. Very often, it’s when we’re at the top of our game—when money is flowing, when you’re feeling the love of your colleagues or friends, or when you’ve been given a new level of influence or power over others.

Drug and alcohol addictions are frequently associated with failure, but very often they are companions to success. Whether it’s our pop culture icons, our athletic heroes, famous historical figures, or the politicians who represent us, society is rife with examples of brilliant people who’ve battled addiction. Sometimes, as in the case of Oprah Winfrey, they’ve been successful in overcoming their addictive tendencies. For others, however, failure to manage success as an addict has ended in jail, humiliation, or in some cases, death.

So, how do you manage success while in addiction recovery? It’s never easy, but following these seven tips can help:

  1. Take extra precautions as a newly sober addict.
    The most dangerous time for a recovering addict is in the first few months or even the first few years after they’ve become clean and sober. Your emotions are still running high and low, you’re exhilarated by your successful transition out of active addiction, and you may not have completely come to terms with the triggers that sent you spiraling downward in the first place. Remember, working on yourself takes time, and it requires plenty of guided introspection and self-awareness. Be conscious of your vulnerability in the first few years of your sobriety.
  2. Surround yourself with positive people and positive influences.
    “People, places and things” may sound like the lyrics to a broken record, but the reason they’re repeated so often is because they’re vitally important. You simply cannot be successful in recovery if you’re surrounded by the people and influences that supported and enabled you while you were in active addiction. The transition to healthy living doesn’t always require new surroundings, new influences, and new faces, but a change of scenery certainly doesn’t hurt. Recognize the toxic relationships that helped to perpetuate your cycle of addiction and do your best to limit or compartmentalize them. You may not always be able to completely eliminate these negative forces (especially if they’re colleagues or family members), but you control when and how you choose to interact with them.
  3. Stay honest with yourself at all times.
    While people, places, and things have a lot to do with whether we’ll be successful in sobriety, true recovery requires complete and total honesty with yourself and the people who support your efforts. Deceit, lies, and dishonesty are the underpinnings of addiction—it’s how we maintained our addictive lifestyle for so long! Utter, brutal honesty with yourself, your sponsor, your 12-step group, your therapists, your doctors, and your supportive loved ones gives you a safety net that can keep you from the people places and things that have brought you down in the past.
  4. Avoid “Pink Cloud” Syndrome.
    Entering recovery is a joyous time for many people. They feel better, they look better, they think more clearly, and they have a well-earned feeling of accomplishment. When they’re also having success in life or work, the euphoria they feel is understandable, especially after having been through the protracted torment of active addiction. Don’t be lulled into this “Pink Cloud,” however. While it’s often a short-lived phenomenon, the Pink Cloud can lead to a dangerous overconfidence that can provide unrealistic expectations, delusions, and ultimately, a disappointment that can end in relapse. Every Pink Cloud has a dark lining, and in recovery it’s important to remember to focus on your journey when the highs get high and the lows get low.
  5. Maintain ties to others in recovery.
    Whether you’ve been substance-free for a few weeks or a few years, you must always stay focused on your recovery. Joining a 12-step group or a anonymous meeting is one way to maintain your connection to other recovering addicts; another way is to enter into an aftercare recovery program like those offered at The GateHouse. We also encouraged “alumni” of The GateHouse to join our Alumni Association. If you’ve been through any of our programs—even if it was just once—you’re eligible to join. It’s a great way to stay connected and keep your recovery top of mind.
  6. Help others.
    Giving back to your community or others in recovery is not only good for the soul, it fosters emotional maturity. By learning to feel good about others’ success, you become less self-absorbed and more other-oriented. This helps you maintain your humility, a vital tool to staying grounded as you become increasingly successful in life, work, and recovery.
  7. Practice mindfulness meditation.
    If you’ve gone through active addiction and lived to tell about it, then you know the emotional rollercoaster recovery can be. Mindfulness meditation is the practice of focusing on your thoughts, feelings, and emotions in the present moment. It can significantly reduce stress and help you come to grips with your emotions so you can maintain balance in your life.

It’s also important to remember that drug and alcohol addictions are chronic, incurable diseases and keeping their symptoms at bay takes hard work, dedication, and positivity. No one in recovery is immune to relapses, but the good news is that with the help of an aftercare recovery program, they become increasingly rare the longer you remain abstinent from your drug or alcohol of choice.

If you’re concerned about your recovery habits or those of a loved one, and you want to speak with an expert who can recommend ways to stay the course, contact us today or give us a call at 717-393-3215.

Our aftercare recovery specialists are here to meet both your immediate and long-term needs!

Open post PA House Majority Leader Bryan Cutler

PA House Leader Bryan Cutler on Government’s Role in the Opioid Crisis: ‘Focus on the Results’

When it comes to the opioid epidemic ravaging Pennsylvania and the rest of the nation, state Rep. Bryan Cutler has a unique perspective.

Not only is he the Majority Leader of the state House of Representatives, Cutler is also a former medical professional who has a keen understanding of health care law.

“I started out as an X-ray tech right out of high school and then got into hospital administration,” Cutler said recently. “All my degrees and certificates are focused in the medical field. My certificate and X-ray license were first. My bachelor’s degree is in health care administration, and even my law degree is focused on health care law.”

Cutler, who represents Southern Lancaster County’s 100th Legislative District, is one of only a handful of state lawmakers who can draw on their medical backgrounds when it comes to making policy in Harrisburg. It’s particularly relevant when it comes to the current opioid crisis.

“When I worked in hospitals, we would use Naloxone all the time to counteract narcotics, so it was something I was familiar with even before we had the recent opioid epidemic,” Cutler said. “A medical background certainly does help inform your perspective on this issue, and it certainly helps you understand it better.”

From Managing Pain to Eliminating It

Just as they are in the Senate, Cutler says lawmakers in the House are equally committed to reducing overdoses and stemming the high tide of opioid addiction. His previous work in hospital administration helps him shape the legislative discussions around opioids so policies can be developed that actually makes an impact.

“To go back to the roots of this crisis, you need to understand what helped drive it,” Cutler said. “What a lot of folks don’t realize is that the issue of pain management used to be a federally scoreable event for hospitals. Their scores were affected by patient satisfaction, which, in turn, affected their reimbursement rates.”

In other words, Medicare reimbursement incentives for most hospitals were dependent in part upon the amount of pain their patients were experiencing. Naturally, the more pain they experienced, the less satisfied they were with the care they were being given.

“We went from managing pain to having no pain,” Cutler said. “I think that, in large part, contributed to the rise and increased use of opioids.”

The Path Forward

Now that the Commonwealth, like the rest of the country, is in the throes of the opioid epidemic, Cutler said the issue has become a legislative priority for everyone—representatives, senators, and even the governor. Cutler fully expects action on the subject this fall. And he should know. In his capacity as Majority Leader, Cutler is the one who sets the legislative agenda for the House.

“Heading into the budget this spring, we passed some addiction-related support measures as part of our ‘Strengthening Communities and Supporting Families’ initiative,” Cutler said. “Opioid abuse specifically will become part of a wider plan for addressing a number of health issues as we head into the fall session.”

The Senate also introduced a package of bills in June that are still working their way through the General Assembly.

“We just got the Senate package as we wrapped up the budget [in late June],” Cutler said. “There have been a number of ongoing hearings, and some of the House staff, as well as some Senators, were at a round table in York County in early July. There’s still a lot of information gathering and direct impact verification that’s going on. I see that being a continued high priority into the fall and beyond.”

While the House has passed some bills related to safe disposal practices and parental consent, Cutler firmly believes that there is general acknowledgement that more needs to be done in the long term, especially in the recovery world. He said he has nothing but admiration for organizations like The GateHouse, which are on the front lines of the battle against opioid abuse and substance use disorder in general.

“These are the organizations that are currently trying to figure out ways to help transition individuals from being addicted to getting back into society again and being fully healed,” he said. “That, by its very nature, is a very long process, and unfortunately, our health system is not always set up for that, so that presents another very unique challenge.”

State Government’s Role in the Crisis

Lawmakers can only do so much from a policy perspective, Cutler said.

“What it really comes down to is the state’s role,” he said. “And that is to provide funding for treatment and enable access to treatment.”

While the state’s previous budgets have consistently increased funding for opioid abuse and treatment as well as Naloxone for immediate rescue, Cutler sees organizations like The GateHouse playing the primary role in long-term recovery, with state government providing support in the form of funding and new policies.

“Quite frankly, government can’t address everything,” he said. “Individual needs set up a different path for each person in terms of what will work. That’s why we, as policymakers, need to stay focused on the results.”

A Troubling Evolution

With the general public becoming more aware and more alarmed by the crisis, more money has been freed up to combat it. This has allowed law enforcement to give it greater attention and has put increased pressure on street-level dealers. This increased awareness, attention, and pressure has been welcomed by the recovery community, but the evolution of the crisis isn’t what most have hoped for.

While dealers are starting to pivot away from heroin and black-market prescription opioids, they’re switching to methamphetamines instead. Cutler said this is a natural progression, which isn’t all that surprising.

“This transition or evolution in terms of alternate drugs—we’ve already been through this once already,” he said. “In many cases, addicts have gone from opiates to heroin. As those things change and access changes, it’s only natural that yet another alternative will be given. It’s a natural evolution, and that brings me back to why we have to focus on the outcomes, not necessarily on a particular path.”

Organizations like The GateHouse should be charting the course for patient recovery, not lawmakers, Cutler said.

“They’re the ones best situated to deal with the actual addiction problem,” he said, “and not on one drug or another. As lawmakers, we look to them to help us shape policies that can aid them in their efforts.”

‘Pervasive’ and ‘Personal’

Like many of the people we’ve interviewed for this series, the subject of addiction is a personal one for Cutler.

“I’ve had friends and family members, unfortunately, who have been affected by this,” Cutler said. “In fact, a good friend of mine, who I used to work with at the hospital back in the early 2000s, committed suicide because of it. Another friend, who I went to church with, actually overdosed. I don’t know if that was intentional or unintentional, but the results were the same unfortunately. So, yes. It’s been very real for me.”

After being elected Majority Leader late last year by the House Republican Caucus in Harrisburg, Cutler addressed the General Assembly, Governor Tom Wolf, and other high-ranking officials on New Year’s Day. He told his fellow lawmakers that they need to do more than just debate issues.

“We need to know one another…learn one another’s life stories in a personal and meaningful way,” he told his colleagues. “I think it’s incredibly helpful to know and understand each other’s stories.”

Speaking recently, Cutler expanded on those comments.

“My point was that it’s important for us to share our stories and explain why we are here and what has impacted us,” he said. “That helps us to inform each other about what drives our decision-making process. The opioid situation is no different. This one just happens to be much more pervasive and much more personal. I literally don’t know anybody who hasn’t been directly impacted.”

Open post Ryan Aument

The Opioid Crisis as a Public Policy Issue: The Perspective of Sen. Ryan Aument

Across the country and around the state of Pennsylvania, there are very few lives that are untouched by the effects of the national opioid crisis. It’s true in our small towns, it’s true in our big cities, and it’s true right here in Lancaster County.

In the halls of state government, Pennsylvania lawmakers are actively working to address it.

Senator Ryan Aument, who serves northern Lancaster County’s 36th state Senatorial District, said many of his colleagues in the Pennsylvania Senate have both publicly and privately shared stories about how the opioid epidemic has hit home for them.

“It’s very rare that you engage a family now that doesn’t have a loved one or someone they know touched in some way by the disease of addiction, whether it’s heroin, prescription drug abuse, or something else,” he said. “In my own family, I have a brother-in-law who has struggled for the past number of years with addiction. For him, it started with an opiate prescription for a shoulder surgery. He’s struggled with prescription drug addiction ever since. The sad fact is that nearly every family is impacted by this crisis on some level.”

 

The Frustration for First Responders

 

Even before his brother-in-law’s battles, however, Sen. Aument was hearing about the scourge of addiction and the impact the opioid epidemic was having on Central Pennsylvania.

“About halfway through my first term in the Senate, I did ride-alongs with each of the police departments in the 36th District—at least the ones that had ride-along programs at that time,” he said. “I think I went out with about eight police departments. I typically did a night shift. I would go out on a Friday night from about eight o’clock to about two in the morning. I didn’t do a full shift, but I did a good portion of it.”

Without fail, he said, each and every police officer he talked to cited opioid addiction as their top concern and the top issue that their communities were facing.

“They could even point to certain houses where they had monitored dealing, or where folks had overdosed, or places where they had brought someone back through the administration of Narcan,” he said. “It was eye-opening.”

Several years later, he still hears the frustration from law enforcement. The concern now centers around seeing the same individuals time and time again.

“These officers often feel helpless to get these people the help they need,” Sen. Aument said. “They can hand them off to EMS personnel, but there’s no requirement that they go into treatment. So, of course, this is where you begin to see the bridge to a public policy discussion.”

 

An Issue to Rally Around

 

Sen. Aument said there are a number of people who continue to advocate for involuntary commitments.

“After so many instances of overdose and the administration of Narcan or Naloxone, the question that keeps coming up is, ‘Should there be some sort of rule about when involuntary commitment is required?’” he said. “More importantly, would that even be effective? If somebody is being forced into treatment, that means they’re unwilling to go into treatment, so is it really effective? That’s one issue that the Legislature is still debating.”

And debates in Harrisburg aren’t typically easy. In such a politically polarized environment, even the most rudimentary of discussions can quickly devolve into contentious legislative battles. But when it comes to the opioid crisis, Sen. Aument said Republicans and Democrats seem to have found common ground.

In January 2018, when Gov. Wolf declared the opioid crisis a statewide disaster emergency to, in part, encourage lawmakers to take action, both sides of the aisle rallied around the decision.

“I certainly think he was right to do so, because I think it helps elevate the conversation and shine attention on the issue,” Sen. Aument said. “This is one of those areas where there has been tremendous bipartisan support and agreement. Sen. Gene Yaw, a Republican in our caucus, has been a real leader on these issues and has conducted a number of hearings and has worked closely with the governor. In fact, last year in his budget address, the governor specifically highlighted the work of Sen. Yaw on these issues. It has been good to see such a bipartisan effort, and I do give the governor a lot of credit for bringing attention to these issues and for looking for ways to drive funding out.”

However, Sen. Aument says he doesn’t have a good handle on whether the Commonwealth is being diligent enough in its efforts to follow through on existing policy and program funding.

“We want to make sure that we’re actually taking a look at the return on our investments and measuring outcomes to make sure we’re driving funding to the communities that need it most,” he said. “We also must make sure that those communities are, in turn, using that funding for programs like those at The GateHouse, which are having a real impact, both from an educational standpoint as well as from a treatment and recovery standpoint.”

 

Proposals for Progress

 

This past February, Sen. Aument said, members of the state Senate Republican Caucus held a retreat to discuss legislative priorities.

“The issue of combating the opioid crisis ranked very high among our members,” he said. “It fell just behind economic issues and workforce development, which are always at the top of the list. That should illustrate just how big of a deal this is to lawmakers.”

In mid-June, just as the General Assembly was working to finalize a budget plan for the new fiscal year that began on July 1, Senate Republicans introduced a package of bills aimed at curtailing the opioid crisis through changes in public policy. One of those bills was Sen. Aument’s Opioid Patient Treatment Agreement, Senate Bill 572. The Senator’s cosponsorship memo can be found here.

“One of the areas I believe we need to address is when someone is going to be prescribed an opiate for a protracted length of time,” Sen. Aument said. “In those circumstances, my bill would require an opiate prescription plan that would be agreed to between the physician and the patient. The plan would provide for baseline drug testing to be done, so we know what’s in the patient’s system and we know that that person is not already abusing substances. Then, there would be random drug testing to make sure the plan is being followed.”

Other bills in the package call for limiting opioid prescriptions to seven days unless there is a medical emergency that puts a patient’s health or safety at risk, stiffer penalties for drug dealers, the establishment of a recovery-to-work program to help recovering addicts find occupations through local workforce development boards, and more.

“And these are just some of the specific policy discussions that we’re having,” Sen. Aument said. “There’s no member who’s not hearing from their constituents about this problem and isn’t very much engaged in this issue. We’re looking to provide as much assistance as we can to the folks doing the great work at places like The GateHouse. Legislatively, we want to do as much as we can to give them the tools that they need to help the greatest number of people.”

 

A Problem with Many Perspectives

 

Just about everywhere he goes, Sen. Aument said he hears from people on all sides of the opioid discussion.

“Whether I’m out in the community talking to families or whether I’m talking to law enforcement or taking tours of facilities, it’s on everybody’s minds,” he said. “We are also receiving calls in our offices in Lititz and Harrisburg, as well. In many cases it’s a family member who’s very, very concerned for a loved one and is looking for resources and ultimately an answer. In some cases, the individual may be interested in treatment and we can make a referral or direct them to a resource like The GateHouse.”

In other cases, however, it may be a family member who’s concerned and is trying to get help for a loved one who has yet to show an interest in treatment.

“Obviously, that’s a far more difficult conversation,” Sen. Aument said. “And it once again brings up this discussion of whether you can or should force someone into treatment who doesn’t want to be there. I hear from folks on all sides of this aspect of the issue.”

There are no easy answers, he said.

“I’ve talked to folks—really smart people who know these issues and know the industry really well—and even they have different perspectives and opinions about it,” Sen. Aument said. “And then you have medical personnel and law enforcement officials who are just looking to get some help to stop the repeated overdoses. It’s incredibly demoralizing for EMS and police. They continue to express to me their tremendous frustration just about every time I speak with them.”

Narcan and Naloxone are both effective treatments for overdoses, but they’re also very expensive and can drain public resources. That’s where lawmakers have to draw clear lines and decide when enough is enough.

“It’s a tough one,” Sen. Aument said. “If you back me into a corner, I think there almost has to be a trigger at some point when you’re dealing with the same individual four and five times, over and over. I don’t know what the magic number is, but I do believe there ought to be some sort of requirement to seek treatment when you’ve been revived numerous times. While I recognize that for some of those folks it may not be effective, maybe for one or two it will.”

Open post District Attorney Craig Stedman

Where Drugs and Crime Intersect: District Attorney Craig Stedman’s Perspective

When Craig Stedman began his career as an assistant district attorney 28 years ago, the drug epidemic facing the country was crack cocaine. Heroin or opioids weren’t even a close second.

“You could count on one hand how many heroin cases we had,” he said recently. “Even at the beginning of my term as DA in 2008, we didn’t have as many opioid problems as we do today. In the past five years, we’ve just had an absolute explosion in heroin cases and heroin-related deaths.”

From his position as the county’s top law enforcement official, Stedman sees the impact arrests and convictions are having on the local illicit drug market. Unfortunately, he said, the problem isn’t going away—it’s just going in a different direction.

Just recently, for example, the Lancaster County Drug Task Force captured a long-time heroin dealer who was selling cocaine and methamphetamines. He had no heroin on him.

“We asked him, ‘You’re a heroin dealer! What are you doing with this stuff?’ He said, ‘Look, dude, I’m not catching a body in Lancaster County.’”

Stedman said dealers aren’t giving up, they’re just adapting to changing conditions. Fentanyl-laced heroin is killing people in high numbers, and drug dealers know that if what they sell kills someone, they’re going to jail for a long time.

“And they’re not willing to take that risk,” he said. “So, while we’re definitely making a difference from an enforcement perspective, I’ll be the first to tell you—and I’ve said this a million times—we are not going to arrest our way out of this problem.”

The Bigger Picture

The long-term answer isn’t enforcement, Stedman said. The long-term answer is education, prevention, and treatment.

“And not just treatment—long-term treatment,” he said. “Short-term rehab just doesn’t give the brain of a heavy heroin abuser the time it needs to recover from acute addiction.”

Aftercare is critical, Stedman said.

“As a country and as a county, we need to invest in long-term treatment,” he said. “As a heroin addict, you don’t go into a 15-day rehab and expect everything to be just fine. Heroin addicts are going to struggle with this the rest of their lives. Thankfully, organizations like The GateHouse understand that. They treat the whole person, not just the symptoms of the addiction.”

To truly address the problem, Stedman believes local, state, and national leaders need to make treatment a priority with proper funding.

“So far, unfortunately, I haven’t seen a willingness to do that, so you’re getting this revolving door,” he said. “These people think they’re fine because they’ve been told they’re fine, but they’re not fine. They’re heroin addicts, and their brains are wired that way. It’s science. They need the right tools.”

The Paths to Addiction

Although his focus is on the adjudication of crimes, Stedman said he’s learned a lot about addiction during his time as a prosecutor. He said he sees two typical paths to opioid addiction.

The first is through prescription medication.

“We’re learning that some people are more biologically prone to addiction than others,” he said. “After a surgery, two people might go and get an opioid prescription. One of them might say, ‘I never want to use that stuff ever again.’ The other might say, ‘This is the greatest feeling I’ve ever had. I never want to stop.’ At that point, it’s no longer a choice. It’s an addiction.”

The second path is the “gateway path.”

“That’s the more traditional one, and unfortunately, it’s the one a lot of heroin users take,” he said. “They start with alcohol, or marijuana. They’ve got the biology, they love the high, so they start using or drinking more and more, and they find out they can’t recreate that high they crave. So, they switch to cocaine, and the same thing happens. At first, they’re like, ‘Oh, this is awesome,’ but then they become tolerant to it. Now they’re using cocaine all the time to recreate that high, and it doesn’t work. That’s when they switch to heroin.”

Had they never been exposed to the drug, they would probably be fine living their entire lives never having a concern about it, Stedman said. Once they’re exposed, either through experimentation or prescription, it takes over their lives—and the lives of those around them.

“It doesn’t just damage the person who’s using,” he said. “It destroys everyone who cares about them. It’s this huge wake. The family keeps trying, and they can’t get them to get help. We actually did a public service announcement with a couple of mothers who lost their kids. It’s gut-wrenching stuff. It’s horrible.”

Beyond Arrests and Convictions

Stories like these are why he’s tried to find new and innovative ways to address drug crimes before they start. A few years ago, Stedman hired community outreach coordinator, Sarah Fritz. It was the first hire of its kind in the history of the Lancaster County DA’s office.

“She’s not a lawyer, and she’s not a police officer,” he said. “She’s a civilian. Her whole focus is on building relationships within the county and within the school systems to further the goals of outreach, prevention, and education.”

While she has addressed bullying, pornography, and other social ills affecting the county’s youth, Stedman said Fritz’s primary outreach efforts have centered around drugs.

“Again, we’re not going to enforce our way out of this,” he said. “We need to be much more proactive, and that’s why we’ve really tried to think outside the box—beyond arrests and convictions.”

Speaking of boxes, Stedman’s office also introduced a lock-box initiative using drug money seized from dealers.

“Since one of the key pathways to opioid addiction is prescription drugs, we’ve taken forfeiture money and bought little lock boxes to hand out,” he said. “They have little combinations on them, and they’re designed to encourage people to lock up their prescription medications.”

While the lock boxes aren’t meant to withstand overwhelming force, Stedman said, they’re just sturdy enough to keep dangerous prescriptions out of the wrong hands.

“A lot of people who have surgeries and are prescribed controlled substances don’t even think about it,” he said. “They take them home and put them on the top shelf of their medicine cabinet and forget how dangerous they are.”

The lock boxes are a way for people to make sure these medications are secured.

“This is a tangible way to do something proactive,” Stedman said. “If it saves one life, it’s worth it.”

Diversionary Programs

One of the big issues facing law enforcement is what to do with offenders once they’ve been caught. In Lancaster County, whether to prosecute a case or refer it to a diversionary program is determined on case by case basis, Stedman said.  Sometimes it’s an easy decision, sometimes it’s not.

“The guy who sells heroin for money to people he doesn’t know, and someone dies, he’s going to be treated a whole lot worse than two heroin addicts who were friends and users together and one gives it to the other and that person dies,” Stedman said. “They’re just completely different situations.”

Lancaster County law enforcement reserves its harshest penalties for what Stedman calls “predator dealers.” But not everybody falls into that category. About 22% of the DA’s cases are sent to some sort of diversion or treatment program, whether it’s ARD or a treatment court like drug court, mental health court, or veteran’s court.

“We’ll try to find the right court for the right person,” he said. “Obviously, depending on what the crime is, we have to find the right balance. If a heroin addict broke into someone’s home, for example, there has to be accountability for that.”

It’s tough, because not every case is easily sorted out.

“Many of these people are not bad people,” Stedman said. “They don’t have evil intentions. They’re just addicts. It’s no different than any other disease.”

While Stedman has ultimate authority over how a case is handled in Lancaster County, he doesn’t make the decision himself, he said. Whether a case involving substance abuse is prosecuted or sent to a diversionary program depends on a variety of factors and a variety of input.

“All the programs have teams, so I’ll listen to what the team recommends,” he said. “We also have to talk to the victims. That’s very important. If it’s a victim crime—DUI, personal injury, or something else—we’re going to want to get their input. We also rely a lot on input from the police officers who have often dealt with these people before.”

It is unlikely, for example, that a predator drug dealer would find his way into a treatment court. On the other hand, someone with ties to the community who has slowly descended into criminal behavior as the result of a substance dependence might have the opportunity to enter a diversionary program.

“We’re looking for people who have a chance of success,” Stedman said. “We also look at the drug. Obviously, the marijuana dealer is going to have a better chance of getting more lenient treatment than somebody who’s out there selling fentanyl. With the people selling fentanyl, you know somebody’s probably going to die.”

People who commit sexual offenses are statutorily prohibited from entering diversionary programs, so they’re not even considered, he said.

“We also have a modified track,” Stedman said. “It’s not necessarily a diversionary program, but it’s not a straight guilty plea, either. If you complete the appropriate program, we’ll drop the felony and you’ll just have a misdemeanor on your record. For some of the cases that are in the gray area, a modified track usually works well for everybody involved.”

The Pursuit of Justice

When it comes down to the final decision, however, Stedman said he and the team are asking themselves one very important question: “What should happen here?”

“It’s a complicated question in one way, but in another way, it’s a really simple question,” he said. “What’s the right thing to do? Does this person need to be in jail? Does this person need a second chance? Will this person benefit from a modified track? What is the best thing?”

Stedman said it’s important to treat everyone as an individual.

“They’re not just numbers in a case file,” he said. “The victims are people and the defendants are, too. We’re just tasked with the job of determining what’s going to be the best long-term outcome for the community. If the team can sell me on a case, and they want to take a chance, then I’m not afraid to do that. Sometimes it backfires. Sometimes it doesn’t work.  Unfortunately, nobody gives you a crystal ball.”

While the DA’s drug task force is bringing in more drug-related criminals than ever before, Stedman said more work needs to be done. Drug-related deaths are everywhere—even in places you’d least expect them.

“We just had a case a couple months ago, where we had a death in prison and made arrests,” he said. “A couple of guys who were picking up trash on work release arranged to have someone put heroin out for them. They brought it back to the prison, and one guy died. Another guy almost died.”

Tragedies like these often leave Stedman shaking his head.

“I think we need a stronger word than ‘addiction,’” he said. “I don’t think that word captures it enough. If you put an axe and some heroin on the table in front of some of these addicts and say, ‘If you take the heroin, we’ll chop your hand off,’ they’re not even going to think about it. They’re going to tell you to chop their hand off. They can’t even think straight. It’s just completely taken over their brains. That’s why I really appreciate the work that organizations like The GateHouse are doing to try to help people.”

Open post Drug Court Judge David Ashworth

Drug Court: A Beacon of Hope for the Hopelessly Addicted

When Lancaster County’s drug court first opened its doors in 2005, no one knew whether the pilot program would meet its many goals or head to the scrap heap of well-intentioned, but unworkable initiatives.

Expectations were high. Drug court promised to improve public safety, save taxpayer dollars, and reduce drug and alcohol recidivism among repeat low-level offenders. Naturally, there were plenty of skeptics.

Fifteen years later, however, drug court has become a Lancaster County institution and a vital part of the community. Not only has it met or exceeded its lofty goals, drug court has transformed the lives of more than 200 graduates of the program, who have gone on to lead better, more productive lives.

For Judge David L. Ashworth, who has served as drug court judge since the very beginning, it’s one of the most professionally rewarding parts of his job.

“It’s tremendously rewarding,” he said. “It’s really neat to see people get their lives back.”

A Program that Works

 

When it began, drug court was wholly unique within the Lancaster County judiciary. Part treatment program, part support system, and part judicial proceeding, drug court brings together prosecutors, defense attorneys, probation officers, law enforcement officials, social service representatives and the treatment community. These groups work together to provide sentencing alternatives for qualifying offenders who show a demonstrated desire to change their lives and break the cycle of addiction that has fueled their petty criminal behavior.

Unlike typical courtroom proceedings, drug court can often be quite animated. It’s not unusual to hear members of the public cheering from the gallery as participants describe their achievements in recovery. There are tears, too, of course, as people come to grips with what they’ve done and discuss how their lives have changed since they entered drug court.

“The community has really embraced it,” Judge Ashworth said. “And not just the recovery community—law enforcement, the District Attorney’s office, and everybody else. It is clearly recognized now as a program that works.”

People, Not just Offenders

 

Be that as it may, the program is not for everybody.

In a TedX talk delivered in 2015, Judge Ashworth told the audience that drug court is not a “hug a thug” program. Those accused of drug dealing, sexual offenses, or violent crimes are not welcomed into the program. Those looking for an easy way out of jail won’t find it through drug court, because drug court is far from easy, he said.

“It’s a rigorous treatment program that’s designed to give people who want to remain clean and sober the tools to do so,” Judge Ashworth said. “In many cases, it’s much harder than spending time in jail.”

For the people who do take it seriously and spend time working the 12-18-month program, the results are rarely disappointing.

“What’s really neat about drug court is that you get to know these people as people, not just offenders,” Judge Ashworth said. “In many cases, I have come to consider them my friends.”

For the last 10 years, Judge Ashworth has taught about drug court, addiction, and recovery at Franklin & Marshall College.

“Quite a number of the graduates who have stayed involved come back and talk to my classes at F&M,” he said. “And I am routinely going out to high schools in the county and taking a drug court graduate with me. I was recently out at Hempfield and Conestoga Valley, and every year, I go to Manheim Township and talk to 400 freshmen.”

Lancaster County was the 13th county in Pennsylvania to adopt the drug court concept. There are now more than 100 treatment courts across the Commonwealth, Judge Ashworth said.

“When I say treatment courts, it’s the drug court model, but now they’ve expanded it to mental health court and veterans court,” he said. “Philadelphia even has prostitution and DUI courts. It’s all the same concept.”

To graduate from drug court, participants must complete an approved treatment program, maintain a permanent recovery sponsor, attend at least three drug counseling meetings per week, maintain full-time employment, remain drug-free for 90 consecutive days, and develop an aftercare plan.

That’s where recovery centers like The GateHouse come in.

Aftercare: The critical role of The GateHouse

 

“We have a lot of people who have gone through The GateHouse, and we have worked with The GateHouse since the very beginning,” Judge Ashworth said. “In fact, we have graduates who are working at The GateHouse now as counselors. I was just out at the women’s facility not too long ago, and one of our graduates is a counselor there. Another one worked there for years and has since gone on to get her master’s degree and is making a big impact in the recovery world.”

Judge Ashworth said the Lancaster County Drug and Alcohol Commission is the agency tasked with helping drug court find aftercare treatment facilities for its participants.

“There are certain facilities that are approved through county funding, and The GateHouse is one of them,” he said. “Depending on the specific needs of the individual, we will match them up with the appropriate facility.  We have a lot of people, who when they arrive at drug court, they first go into an in-patient program and then transition to a residential treatment program like The GateHouse. We use White Deer Run Cove Forge as the initial in-patient treatment program. When they get out of that facility, often times they’ll go to The GateHouse.”

The GateHouse is actually very well known within the recovery community, according to Judge Ashworth.

“We’re really fortunate,” he said. “Because we have been dealing with The GateHouse for a really long time, if we have an urgent need, very often we can cut through a lot of the administrative stuff and get them in there relatively quickly if there’s a bed available. It’s always tragic when people can’t find the resources. Lancaster County, unlike counties elsewhere, has tremendous resources. The best place to start is the drug and alcohol commission. They can point you in the right direction. Unfortunately, a lot of people don’t know where to start.”

RELATED: Addiction Through the Eyes of the Lancaster County Drug and Alcohol Commission

The Impact of the Opioid Crisis

 

Although there were at least 1,000 people who could have qualified for drug court in the beginning, the program was only extended to 50 people. Over the years, enrollment has grown to 90 at any given time.

“It fluctuates,” Judge Ashworth said. “We have three drug court officers. We have to be careful not to expand the program too much, because then it just becomes standard supervision, and the individualized treatment part of drug court will get lost. If you lose that, you lose the whole benefit of it.”

One of the reasons the program has expanded, however, is because more and more addicts are seeking ways to get healthy. The attention the opioid crisis has been given over the last few years has placed greater importance on holistic treatment of the individual and on new types of solutions like drug court.

“Those of us who have been involved in the recovery community for so long find it interesting that people are suddenly recognizing it as an ‘opioid crisis,’” Judge Ashworth said. “The reality is that this has been an issue for a long time. Quite frankly, the only reason it’s become so publicized is because people are finally realizing that it’s not just an inner-city issue. It’s not just a minority or low-income issue.”

It wasn’t until it began to impact the middle-class and upper middle-class sectors of society that the opioid problem became a “crisis,” he said. “Addiction affects everybody.”

“Has it become more of an issue since it’s been declared a crisis? I guess yes, because I see young kids whose very first drug of choice is heroin, which years ago was unheard of!” the judge said. “We see a tremendous increase in the number of people who start out with prescription medication and transition to the cheaper heroin when they run out of their prescription. We see a lot more of that than we have in the past. Thankfully, doctors have become more educated about it now, but for the longest time, you’d have a surgery, and a doctor would write a script for 60 oxy and then the person’s off to the races. They become addicted that quickly. Fortunately, that’s changing.”

A disturbing Trend

 

Recently, however, the influx of deadly fentanyl-laced heroin into Lancaster County has created a shift in the addiction landscape, Judge Ashworth said.

“Tragically, what we’re seeing—and we’re only going to see more of this—is an increasing number of people switching to methamphetamines, rather than run the risk of dying from a fentanyl overdose,” he said. “While Narcan works for heroin, if there’s too much fentanyl in there, they’re dead before the Narcan even has a chance to take effect. The police often find people with needles still stuck in people’s arms, and they’re dead before they can even receive the Narcan.”

Judge Ashworth fears meth is the street drug of the future.

“We’re going to see a huge increase in meth in the coming years,” he said. “It’s going to become even more of a problem. When police roll up on someone taking heroin, they’re usually pretty chill. When they’re all jacked up on meth, though, it’s a much different and more dangerous situation. Instead of a docile heroin addict, the police are now often confronted with a violent person, and it can get very ugly very quickly.”

He said he’s actually had drug court participants tell him they’ve heard about fentanyl-laced heroin, so they “decided to try something safer, like meth.”

“That’s just crazy,” the judge said, “Just because you can’t taint meth with fentanyl—it can’t be cut that way—that doesn’t make it any safer. In fact, meth is just as addictive, if not more so, than opioids.”

While the transition to meth doesn’t diminish the crisis created by the opioid epidemic, Judge Ashworth believes the discussion around street drugs needs to change.

“I think it’s great that we’re raising awareness to the opioid crisis, but I think just focusing on that alone is naïve,” he said. “The conversation should be about addiction to any substance. Any mind-altering substance needs to be addressed. For our 200th graduate, it was alcohol. The addictive behavior needs to be addressed, not just the substance abuse.”

The future of Drug Court

 

With drug court having proven its worth to the legal community, the law enforcement community and the recovery community, Lancaster County has bought completely in to the concept. And the idea has spread. Judge Jeffery Wright now oversees Lancaster County’s veterans’ court and Judge Margaret Miller oversees the mental health court. Judge Jeff Conrad is currently being trained as the backup drug court judge, and he’ll eventually take over the role when Judge Ashworth retires.

But don’t expect that to be anytime soon.

“I plan on being around for a while,” Judge Ashworth said. “While I am the second-most senior judge on the bench here, I’m not retiring just yet.”

That’s good news for drug court.

Scroll to top